By Zakaria Korte, Korte Law in association with Amereller
Multinational groups with operations in Morocco are facing a more structured and assertive transfer pricing environment. Morocco has aligned much of its framework with OECD standards while preserving key local specificities in law and practice. This article provides a practical overview of the legal basis, documentation expectations, areas of audit focus, the availability of advance pricing agreements, and concrete steps to strengthen audit readiness—tailored for finance and tax leaders managing Moroccan subsidiaries or branches.
Article 214-III of the Moroccan General Tax Code (Code Général des Impôts, or CGI) empowers the tax authorities to adjust a Moroccan entity's taxable profits when it is dependent on, or has control over, related entities and transactions are not priced at arm's length. In substance, the rule targets situations where profits are shifted out of Morocco through non-market pricing or conditions.
The article permits the administration to reconstitute taxable income by reference to the conditions that would have prevailed between independent enterprises. In practice, this translates into a need for Moroccan taxpayers to:
Morocco has adopted the OECD's two-tier documentation approach in practice, comprising a Master File and a Local File.
Master File. This group-level document describes the global business, value drivers, supply chains, legal and ownership structure, intangibles strategy, intercompany financing framework, overall transfer pricing policies, and consolidated financial and tax positions.
Local File. This Morocco-specific document focuses on the local entity's functions, assets, and risks; detailed descriptions of intercompany transactions; contracts and pricing policies; and economic analyses supporting arm's-length pricing.
In addition, auditors expect robust underlying evidence:
Morocco is broadly aligned with OECD transfer pricing principles. Key Moroccan specificities include:
Auditors assess whether group-level management activities confer a specific benefit to the Moroccan entity. They request detailed evidence such as calendars, workplans, deliverables, and time allocations. Allocation keys must be objective and linked to cost drivers.
IT support, engineering, R&D support, and back-office functions require a demonstrable link between services rendered and Moroccan operations.
Payments for trademarks, technology, software, and know-how attract high scrutiny. Evidence should show that the royalty base and rate reflect the value of intangibles actually exploited in Morocco.
Loans and guarantees receive attention when interest is substantial or capital structure appears thin.
Focus is on transparency of the cost base, exclusion of shareholder costs, and the arm's-length nature of any markups.
Morocco has established an APA mechanism allowing taxpayers to agree in advance with the tax administration on transfer pricing methods for specified controlled transactions.
Morocco's tax authorities use a risk-based audit selection approach with intensified focus on transfer pricing:
Where adjustments are proposed, additional corporate income tax may be assessed with late-payment interest and penalties. Settlements are possible, but strong documentation is the best mitigation.
For multinational groups operating in Morocco, transfer pricing success hinges on aligning global policies with Moroccan realities, presenting convincing evidence of value, and anticipating audit expectations. By operationalizing documentation and governance around Morocco's requirements, multinationals can reduce disputes, safeguard margins, and achieve durable certainty for intercompany services and other controlled transactions.
For expert guidance, contact Korte Law.